the pattern and kits mix-up/randomisation.the export options are great (raw one shots, processed one shots, loops, stems, etc).I like being able to use it standalone to just make beats.(I really like using MPC Drum Synth Multi for the same reason). I really like how it’s 8 track… reminds me of the Digitakt… I find having 8 voices makes me focus way more on the sounds I’m using, whereas 16 makes me start looking outside of just drums.the processing of drum samples is well implemented.the native sample library is really good.If you’re buying either just to use as a sample organiser it’s probably overpriced. I’ve also demo’d both in the last week and gravitated to XO. So aside the sequencers, personally I don’t see any use for both Atlas and Xo. I use ADSR sample manager, with tags and filters it’s relatively easy to find what you are looking for. I have my samples already organized by vendor, genre, type, and often extra infos. They claim to “organize your samples” but it seems the big point is to create almost random kits, I don’t see how they are supposing to organize samples with a cloud of points. I don’t see any use for them in a typical workflow. I was not able to find a hihatĪnyway I don’t get the point with these softwares. With Atlas I had issues selecting sounds in galaxy view, clicking on hihats cluster but finding completely different sounds. XO suggestions seems mostly random, it mixes kicks with synth stabs, digital fx’s and so on, just to make an example… I find Atlas similarity suggestions works way better than XO. Demoed both Atlas and XO in the past few days, I like both UI’s and graphics.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |